Abstract

The accuracy of the diffusion approximation is compared with more accurate solutions for describing light interaction with biological tissues. Generally the diffusion approximation underestimates the light distribution in the surface region, and, for high albedos, it significantly underestimates the fluence rate. This difference is only a few percent for albedos of less than 0.5 due to the dominance of collimated light. As the anisotropy of scattering increases, deviations increase. In general, fluxes can be computed more accurately with the diffusion approximation than fluence rates. For anisotropic scattering, better results can be obtained by simple transforms of optical coefficients using the similarity relations. The similarity relations improve flux calculations, but computed fluence rates have substantial errors for high albedo and the large index of refraction differences at the surface.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

Light and temperature distribution in laser irradiated tissue: the influence of anisotropic scattering and refractive index

Massoud Motamedi, Sohi Rastegar, Gerald LeCarpentier, and Ashley J. Welch
Appl. Opt. 28(12) 2230-2237 (1989)

Applications of the 1-D diffusion approximation to the optics of tissues and tissue phantoms

James L. Karagiannes, Zengyao Zhang, Bess Grossweiner, and Leonard I. Grossweiner
Appl. Opt. 28(12) 2311-2317 (1989)

Collimated light sources in the diffusion approximation

Thorsten Spott and Lars O. Svaasand
Appl. Opt. 39(34) 6453-6465 (2000)

Similarity relations for the interaction parameters in radiation transport

Douglas R. Wyman, Michael S. Patterson, and Brian C. Wilson
Appl. Opt. 28(24) 5243-5249 (1989)

Validity of the diffusion approximation in bio-optical imaging

Bingquan Chen, Knut Stamnes, and Jakob J. Stamnes
Appl. Opt. 40(34) 6356-6366 (2001)