Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Three-dimensional Bone Imaging: Optical Coherence Tomography versus Micro Computer Tomography

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and micro-computed tomography (μCT) were applied to a bone sample, a 3×4×4mm cube of fixed substantia spongiosa from an arthritic human hip. Three-dimensional image sets (1.0mm × 0.9mm × 1.6mm) were acquired with both imaging systems for the same volume of interest. For better navigation, the sample surface was additionally imaged with microscopy. The resulting OCT images were compared stepwise to the according μCT images, showing a high correlation regarding the visualization of individual trabeculae. System based imaging differences were also found: due to scattering, OCT is limited to an imaging depth of about 1mm, while μCT is capable of imaging the complete trabecular bone architecture. However, OCT images cells and the inner bone structures in contrast to μCT at similar nominal resolutions (5μm respectively 6.5μm).

© 2009 OSA/SPIE

PDF Article
More Like This
Three-dimensional imaging of in vivo bones and joints with diffuse optical tomography

Huabei Jiang, Yong Xu, Nicusor Iftimia, L. Lyndon Key, and Marcy B. Bolster
TuE4 Biomedical Topical Meeting (BIOMED) 2002

Optical computed tomography microscope for three-dimensional imaging

Ravil Chamgoulov, Pierre Lane, and Calum MacAulay
FTuR5 Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2004

Non-contact scanning diffuse optical tomography for three-dimensional vascular imaging in a murine bone graft model

Jingxuan Ren, Songfeng Han, Ashley R. Proctor, Danielle S. W. Benoit, and Regine Choe
JM3A.7 Cancer Imaging and Therapy (Cancer) 2016

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.